Overview
The Rigellian stasis gun was a hand-held weapon used by the Rigellian alien Tana Nile. She considered the weapon to be specially powerful and used it to shot Ulik, the powerful Rock Troll warrior, while he was fighting Nile's Asgardian allies. She had assumed that any living being would be defeated by the stasis effect, but the non-natural Ulik resisted it, being only stunned. Thor Odinson eventually defeated Ulik, but he admitted that he would have failed if it hadn't been for Nile's stasis gun. He then collapsed an empty building on the opening of a tunnel used by the Trolls, and asked Nile…
⚔️Canon Versus Matchup Arena
Simulate authentic head-to-head clashes featuring Rigellian Stasis GunThor Vol 1 211 against rival superheroes, supervillains, superpowers, or historic bastions.
CANONICAL VERSUS MATCHUP ENGINE50 / 50 Simulation Box
Simulate authentic head-to-head clashes between People (Superheroes & Supervillains), Gadgets, Abilities, or Places.

Doctor Doom
Victor von Doom

Mister Mxyzptlk
Mr. Mxyzptlk
TACTICAL VERDICT: Mister Mxyzptlk triumphs with an estimated 63% win probability. Raw destructive energy projection (100 vs 24) proved insurmountable in prolonged exchanges.
3-Round Encounter Breakdown:
Mister Mxyzptlk dictates early tempo, utilizing superior speed and reflexes (100 vs 17) to evade initial advances and land decisive precision strikes.
Mister Mxyzptlk counters with devastating offensive potency (100 Power rating), breaking through A-Bomb's forward defensive perimeter.
Exploiting an opening in the late exchanges, Mister Mxyzptlk's elite martial execution (50 Combat) overwhelms A-Bomb, landing the closing blow to claim the battle.
Publication history
Thor Vol 1 211
Find the publication record ↗Research context
Story significance and character appearances provide collecting context. An issue’s edition, condition, graded population and completed-sale evidence determine which market comparisons apply.
About this record
This article reads the stored Panel Profits Wiki record. Source facts and editorial analysis are separate; missing biographical facts are not inferred.